Reviews · OCTOBER 7, 2026
Claude Haiku 5.5 Lands at $0.10/$0.50 — 90% Cheaper for Short Prompts
Anthropic's new Haiku-class model matches GPT-6 Luna's floor price for requests under 100,000 tokens, adds an adjustable effort setting, and posts benchmark gains that leapfrog its predecessor across knowledge work, computer use, and agentic coding.
Anthropic shipped Claude Haiku 5.5 on October 7, pricing it at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens for any request under 100,000 tokens. That's a 90% cut from Haiku 4.5's $1.00/$5.00, and it lands exactly on the floor OpenAI set for GPT-6 Luna. Above the 100,000-token line, pricing moves to $0.50/$2.50, a 50% reduction from the previous generation. Anthropic estimates average cost to run falls roughly 75% once the updated tokenizer is accounted for, and notes that about 90% of Haiku 4.5 traffic sat in the short-prompt tier.
The pricing symmetry isn't incidental. Ten days after Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Sol/Luna arrived on the same afternoon, the small-model floor has been collectively rewritten. Frontier labs are no longer competing on the headline model; they're competing on what it costs to run the always-on substrate underneath it, the classification, triage, and subagent work that touches every production request.
The benchmark deltas make the pitch sharper. On GDPval-AA v2.1, Haiku 5.5 posts 1,620 against Haiku 4.5's 735 and GPT-6 Luna's 1,437, trailing only Sonnet 5.5 at 1,840. On the offline subset of OSWorld 2.1 it hits 72.4%, up from 15.7% for its predecessor and well past Luna's 48.9%. Terminal-Bench 4.0 tells the same story: 39.2% at maximum effort, around 20% at the default medium setting, versus 0.0% for Haiku 4.5 and 16.4% for Luna. The effort dial is new to the Haiku line and matters more than the headline score, because it lets a developer decide per call whether to pay for depth.
Customer-reported figures, vendor-sourced and directional, point the same direction. Asana's Aaron Vinh reports "over a 30% reduction in latency for task completions and up to 2.5x faster inference per agent turn." HubSpot's Ze'ev Klapow reports Haiku 5.5 scored 92.8% averaged over three runs of its CRM evaluation, the best result among the models it tested. Box's Yashodha Bhavnani reports an 11-point lift over Haiku 4.5 at roughly half the latency. The model ships through Anthropic's API, AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure under the identifier claude-haiku-5-5, with a June 2026 knowledge cutoff.
The structural read is the one that matters. When the last comparable floor move happened, OpenAI's gpt-3.5-turbo repricing in 2023, the workloads that followed weren't the ones vendors predicted; they were the ones that had quietly been uneconomic the week before. Scoring every inbound lead, summarizing every call, classifying every ticket in real time: these are now line items a small team can actually run. The frontier gets the press. The floor gets the deployments.